Do our rights matter?

October 14th, 2011

I was on a shoot in San Francisco the other day and wanted to film the exterior of a federal building – an office of the FDIC is there, there is a metal detector in the lobby and concrete barricades to the entrance plaza. I suppose this is to prevent any homegrown or international terrorists from blowing up a car bomb next to the building, lest they should want to violently protest the fact that the government insures bank deposits.

The rent-a-cops at the front desk told me I could not take pictures or videos of the exterior of the building because, you know, 9/11. As it happens, it is 100% legal to film federal buildings, as the Department of Homeland Security makes explicit here. So their restriction on me was a violation of federal law and my Constitutional rights.

I was on the premises to interview a lawyer in his (private) offices there who actually has a framed copy of the Constitution on his wall. Nevertheless, when I filed a formal complaint with the DHS, he asked me to withdraw it so he wouldn’t have trouble with the building management. I like and respect this guy, though I lost a lot of respect for him as a result of this request. But I complied.

So, do our rights matter? Do relationships with building managers matter more? Is it an indication of a persistent immaturity on my part that I care about these things?

Many times in my life, when I have loudly insisted on my rights, my peers and others have often rolled their eyes and said, “Oh, Nathan.”

Oh, Nathan, why are you such a loudmouth? Oh, Nathan, why must you irritate people so? Oh, Nathan, why can’t you just sit down and shut up for once?

I think pretty much every person I know feels this way about me. So, I ask myself, Oh, Nathan, why do you care? I really have no answer. It feels incredibly lonely and stupid to waste my time and energy this way.

After all, these concerns can seem ridiculous in America. We are so incredibly lucky to have the freedoms that we do have – that our business and political leaders have allowed us to have. (Oh, Nathan.) We are so rich, so free, so spoiled. (Oh, Nathan.) Why should we expect that everyone will respect our legal and Constitutional rights, spirit and letter? (Oh, Nathan.) Haven’t they done enough for us already? (Oh, Nathan.) It’s not like we’re Iran or China or Syria or pretty much any African country. (Oh, Nathan.)

Shutting up now.

Everything is a remix

October 10th, 2011

“I invented nothing new. I simply assembled the discoveries of other men behind whom were centuries of work. Had I worked fifty or ten or even five years before, I would have failed. So it is with every new thing. Progress happens when all the factors that make for it are ready, and then it is inevitable. To teach that a comparatively few men are responsible for the greatest forward steps of mankind is the worst sort of nonsense.” Henry Ford

Followed a trail from boing-boing today, leading to an excellent series of short videos by Kirby Ferguson. Called Everything is a Remix, the series (the fourth and final video is due this fall) gives an entertaining and vividly clear explanation of how art and technology is never “original,” but always builds upon previous work. Part One, below, looks at examples from popular music. Part Two examines the movies, pointing out that of the 10 highest-grossing films of the past decade, 74% are either sequels, remakes or adaptations.

That’s a pretty extraordinary percentage considering how the entertainment business has succeeded in convincing a large number of Americans that all copying is theft – as if their entire business was not based on copying and remixing previous work. Part Two then goes on to show – in a tour-de-force of side-by-side comparison – how even a nominally “original” work, like Star Wars, is actually a transformed collection of shots, storylines, characters and ideas George Lucas borrowed from a wide-variety of sources.

The point of this is not that Lucas is a “thief.” The point is that this is how art has always been created. Other examples are found in Quentin Tarantino’s remix masterpiece, Kill Bill, and, in another extraordinary video produced by Ferguson (and made by Rob Wilson), The Matrix:

Everything Is A Remix: THE MATRIX from robgwilson.com on Vimeo.

Everything is a Remix, Part Three, is timely, as it applies the argument more broadly to technological innovation, with a special focus on Apple. Some people may still not realize that the Macintosh computer was not an original. It was a remix of ideas taken almost entirely from the long-term work of engineers at Xerox. Just as Steve Jobs did not invent the mouse or the GUI, Thomas Edison did not invent electric light, nor Henry Ford the assembly line. These men did what all artists and inventors do: look around them, synthesize what they see and transform it.

Everything is a Remix Part 1 from Kirby Ferguson on Vimeo.

Super 8

June 11th, 2011

I’ll say it’s nice to see a summer movie that’s not a sequel or a prequel or a comic book. And I like J.J. Abrams. I watched every goddamn episode of Lost, and that was an awful lot of sound and hooey, signifying whatever. He’s certainly got fun ideas, even if they’re not his. And the kids trying to make their Super 8 zombie movie rocked.

So, Super 8 is supposed to be like those Spielberg movies we saw as kids. Spielberg, I think, is maybe undervalued. Not his bank account. But, as a director, J.J. is a child in a sandbox – a cool sandbox – compared to Spielberg (who is an older child in an even cooler sandbox compared to, say, Kubrick, who was always old as the stars, which was his sandbox). We can’t treat that fact casually. Spielberg, even as early as Duel, certainly with Jaws and Close Encounters, even to see them today, just runs rings around anything Abrams does or probably ever will do.

It’s just not enough, however cute it might be for a while, to geek out on the Spielberg formula, feel that you’ve “cracked it,” and turn that into a movie, even if Steven produces it for you (and he did what, exactly, on Super 8?). I’m not just relying on memory. I’ve gone back and watched the old Spielberg films, many times, and they hold the fuck up, because he was (is?) a true formal master of cinema. He’s much closer to Kubrick than Abrams is to him, if not quite there. The only director working today who achieves his level of mastery of cinematic action is Tarantino, and he’s got his whole own thing going on.

Super 8 is enjoyable, but only because our expectations are so low these days. A bouillabaisse of The Goonies and Cloverfield, seasoned to taste with Close Encounters, E.T. and a pinch of Jurassic Park, shot self-consciously to sort of look like it was made in 1979, but not really, does not end up tasting like a classic. It just makes you hungry for other, better meals.

HBO No Go

April 29th, 2011

The other day I wrote about wanting to be able to subscribe to HBO without having to pay for an over-priced cable TV package. Today, HBO released an app for Go, its Web-streaming service. This would be a perfect opportunity for the company to offer a Go-only subscription package to people like me, for a fair price. I suggested I’d be happy to pay $20 a month. HBO hasn’t done this, of course.

But at least I’m not alone in thinking it’s a good idea. Scott Stein, over at CNET, is asking similar questions today.

Another time I’ll write more about the noble volunteer army that defends the regime; that is, the phenomenon of regular consumers who come to the defense of poor, struggling media and technology companies (such as Comcast, HBO and Apple) in online comments to point out to us evil socialists (or evil free-market capitalists?) that these corporations are under no obligation to do anything in particular to meet our demands. Namely, the demand that we be allowed to buy their services in the configurations that we want or have some flexibility and openness in the way we use the high-priced gadgets we’ve purchased. It never ceases to amaze me.

Briefly, yeah, it’s true. Companies can mostly sell what they want the way they want to sell it. If HBO doesn’t want to sell subscriptions to non-cable subscribers then, of course, that is their right. It would be silly to claim otherwise. The argument is not about right, though, it’s about smart versus stupid. I happen to believe it’s stupid not to give consumers what they want when you can do so.

The Go app (and website) is proof that the technology exists to deliver the content. All HBO has to do is sell subscriptions to that service. Pretty simple.

I Want My HBO

April 27th, 2011

Right now, I subscribe to Comcast cable. I don’t do this because I like Comcast. In fact, I despise Comcast. I have had some bad relationships with companies over the years, but none worse than Comcast. I won’t go into it but, suffice to say, I believe that screwing their customers – ripping them off, lying to them – is in the corporate DNA.

However, when we moved recently we discovered to our disgust that our only option for high-speed broadband Internet – a necessity for both myself and my wife – was Comcast. And, by ordering basic cable to go along with it, we would actually *save* some money over the same broadband package as a standalone service. The second a comparably speedy alternative is available, I’m kicking Comcast to the curb.

What I’m wondering about today is why I can only get HBO through a cable or satellite provider? I love HBO’s original shows almost as much as I hate Comcast (well, no, not that much), but I will not pay upwards of $100 a month just to get HBO in HD. Why should I have to do that?

Think about it. I pay for Netflix and Hulu Plus and get both of these great services via an easy-to-use widget embedded in my Samsung TV. I frequently purchase TV shows in HD via iTunes – like the current amazing season of FX’s Justified. All of this amounts to vastly less than I would have to pay for anything-above-basic cable. I don’t want the 500 bullshit channels I would have to get via cable or satellite in order to be eligible to pay an extra $20 to get HBO. I just want to pay that $20 and get HBO!

Wouldn’t be tough for them to create a widget, downloadable to my Samsung TV, let me set up an account, give them my money and stream their premium content on demand. What could possibly be wrong with this? It would open up their great content to people who *want to pay for it* but believe cable and satellite services are among the worst consumer “deals” on the market.

See, I am ready and willing to pay for the right to watch HBO’s content. But if they refuse to give me a legitimate way to do so without giving Comcast or DirecTV one more penny, which I will not do, I will simply – and with jaw-dropping ease – download HBO’s shows for free via Bit Torrent.

This is the piece of the whole online “piracy” issue that gets short shrift in the media. I *will pay* for the content I want, if you let me! But if you cockblock me, for no discernible reason whatsoever, I will just take it without your permission. What possible (legitimate) reason could HBO have for pissing on potential subscribers this way? Don’t tell me it’s technologically too difficult, because that would be an obvious lie. Don’t tell me that you have certain licensing agreements blah blah blah, because that’s your fucking problem!

In other words, Hollywood, what I’m saying is this: you have an easy choice to make. Give me a way to easily pay for your content, in the form I want it, when I want it or I will just take it. You can sue me, sure, but you can’t sue all of us. And, along the way, you will become reviled by those with the greatest fanboy potential, as the recording industry learned the hard way.

You may not like it. You may want to hang on to those old business models you know so well. But that ship has not only sailed, it’s halfway to China. Make all the treaties you want, lobby, bribe and asslick the entire Congress; it will make no difference. You lost. Stop being such dicks about it. Get over it!

Now pick yourselves up and do what you do best. Sell. Sell directly to us, because you can, sell us what we want, when we want it, make it fun and easy as getting drunk, and we will open our wallets. Kind of a no-brainer.

Orson Whales

March 9th, 2011

Orson Whales from Alex Itin on Vimeo.

Teletrivia Episode 4

November 18th, 2010

Teletrivia Episode 4: Holiday Specials from Nathan Jongewaard on Vimeo.

Hugs Aren’t Enough, Volume One

October 15th, 2010

Hugs Aren’t Enough, Volume One from Nathan Jongewaard on Vimeo.

The sketch comedy team, Hugs Aren’t Enough, is submitting this reel to SF SketchFest. It includes new cuts of the three sketches previously posted and our latest one, Hangover in a Bottle.

Teletrivia

October 12th, 2010

Episode one of the web series that I created and produced for TV.com is finally live on the site. It’s called Teletrivia and it’s a short trivia quiz based on what’s on TV. Been working hard on it; I’m working on the second episode now.

The Grenade, version one

September 1st, 2010

The Grenade, version 1 from Nathan Jongewaard on Vimeo.